COMPARE
Infisical vs CyberArk Conjur
CyberArk Conjur brought secrets management to the enterprise. Infisical makes it accessible to every team — without the complexity, professional services, or vendor lock-in.
Looking to improve your secret management processes?Talk to an expert
Infisical provided all the functionality and security settings we needed to boost our security posture and save engineering time. Whether you're working locally, running kubernetes clusters in production, or operating secrets within CI/CD pipelines, Infisical has a seamless prebuilt workflow.— Adrien Carreira, Head of Infrastructure, Hugging Face
Executive Summary
CyberArk Conjur is a secrets management platform built for machine identity and non-human access control, originally designed as the DevOps extension of CyberArk's Privileged Access Management (PAM) ecosystem. It offers policy-as-code governance, robust Kubernetes authentication, and deep integration with CyberArk's Enterprise Password Vault. Conjur exists in three flavors: Conjur Open Source (LGPL v3), Secrets Manager Self-Hosted (Enterprise), and Secrets Manager SaaS. However, this layered approach comes with trade-offs:
- Ecosystem dependency: Conjur is designed as part of the broader CyberArk Identity Security Platform — now owned by Palo Alto Networks following a $25 billion acquisition completed in February 2026. Key capabilities like secret rotation rely on CyberArk's Central Policy Manager (CPM) and Enterprise Password Vault, creating deep vendor coupling. Organizations evaluating Conjur should consider the long-term implications of platform consolidation under Palo Alto Networks' roadmap.
- Operational complexity: Conjur Enterprise follows an appliance-based deployment model with Leader/Standby/Follower topology. High availability requires managing replication, unsealing with a master data key, certificate rotation across multiple nodes, and allowlisting authenticators on every node. Professional services are often required for initial deployment and ongoing maintenance.
- Limited developer workflows: Conjur's OSS edition ships without a dashboard UI. The Enterprise and SaaS versions provide a web console, but lack built-in approval workflows, change request reviews, environment comparison, access request portals, or native Slack/Teams integration. Governance beyond RBAC requires custom development or integration with external ticketing systems.
- Narrow integration surface: While Conjur integrates with core DevOps tools (Kubernetes, Ansible, Jenkins, Terraform, Puppet), it lacks the breadth of native secret syncs, first-party SDKs, and serverless/PaaS integrations that modern platform teams expect. Client libraries for most languages are community-maintained or auto-generated from OpenAPI specs, without built-in caching, token lifecycle management, or helper methods.
Infisical takes a different approach: security through simplicity, with full transparency.
- Open source and self-hostable: MIT-licensed core with 25,000+ GitHub stars, over 2 million global downloads, and a 100,000+ member developer community. Deploy on your own infrastructure, audit the codebase, and eliminate vendor lock-in. Cloud-hosted and self-hosted options available.
- Built-in governance workflows: Native approval chains, access requests, temporary access with auto-expiration, change request workflows, and Slack/Teams integration — all out of the box. No custom development or external ticketing systems required.
- Complete developer lifecycle: From local development to staging, CI/CD, IaC, and production — secrets are managed consistently with 35+ secret syncs, 10+ first-party SDKs with built-in caching and auth management, and native integrations for every major platform, framework, and serverless provider.
- Unified platform: Secrets management, PKI, PAM, KMS, secret scanning, and AI agent governance — all in a single platform. No need to purchase and integrate separate products for each capability.
The result: Faster adoption, better security hygiene, no vendor dependency chains, and fewer manual processes — all delivered out of the box.
Infisical
CyberArk Conjur
Why It Matters
Open Source
Fully open source under MIT license with 25,000+ GitHub stars and 2M+ downloads. Transparent codebase publicly audited by the security community. Large ecosystem of tutorials, examples, and peer-driven resources.
Conjur OSS is open source under LGPL v3. Enterprise features (LDAP/SAML auth, audit streaming, FIPS modules, HA clustering, web UI) require a commercial license. The broader CyberArk ecosystem is proprietary.
MIT licensing provides maximum flexibility with no copyleft obligations. LGPL v3 requires sharing modifications to the Conjur server itself, and enterprise-critical features are gated behind commercial licensing, creating an upgrade path that narrows deployment options.
Self-Hosting
Full self-hosted deployment support via Helm, Docker Compose, or Linux packages. Run on your own infrastructure with complete data sovereignty. Supports air-gapped and on-prem deployments.
Conjur OSS and Enterprise both support self-hosted deployment. Runs as Docker containers on RHEL or Ubuntu. Supports air-gapped environments. SaaS option also available.
Both platforms support self-hosting. Conjur's appliance-based model requires more operational investment for HA and upgrades compared to Infisical's stateless architecture.
Dashboard UI
Modern, responsive dashboard designed for both developers and security teams. Configure secrets, view audit logs, manage access, and monitor usage — enabling a self-serve model that reduces friction and drives adoption.
Conjur OSS has no web UI — all operations are CLI/API only. Conjur Enterprise and SaaS provide a web console for secret management and configuration, but with limited workflow capabilities compared to modern platforms.
Security tools are most effective when they're widely adopted. A dashboard accessible to all team members — not just CLI-proficient engineers — drives consistent usage and reduces shadow practices. The absence of a UI in OSS makes evaluation and adoption harder for teams without deep CLI expertise.
Native Authentication
Tokenless authentication using OIDC for both human and machine identities. Human access via SSO (Okta, Azure AD, Google, any OIDC IdP). Machine access via short-lived identity tokens (K8s SA tokens, AWS IAM roles, GCP Workload Identity).
Multiple authenticators including Kubernetes (cert-based and JWT-based), AWS IAM, Azure, GCP, OIDC, LDAP, and API keys. Authenticators must be individually enabled (allowlisted) on each Conjur node. LDAP/SAML require Enterprise license.
Both platforms support robust authentication. Infisical's approach requires less per-node configuration. Conjur's allowlisting model adds operational steps but provides granular control over which authenticators are active on each node.
SDKs
First-party SDKs for 10+ languages (Node.js, Python, Go, Java, .NET, Ruby, PHP, C++) with built-in auth, caching, token lifecycle management, and helper methods. Write less boilerplate code.
Client libraries for Ruby, Python, Go, Java, .NET. Most are community-maintained or auto-generated from OpenAPI spec. Provide raw API bindings — auth management, caching, and lifecycle logic must be assembled separately. Summon utility provides an alternative for secret injection.
First-party SDKs with built-in caching, auth management, and helper methods mean developers write far less boilerplate. Auto-generated bindings and community-maintained libraries require teams to build this additional logic themselves and may lag behind server releases.
CLI
Full-featured CLI for secret injection and local development. infisical run injects secrets into any process with a single command. SSH workflows simplified with infisical ssh add-host and infisical ssh connect.
Conjur CLI for policy management, secret retrieval, and administrative operations. Summon utility injects secrets as environment variables into subprocesses. Secretless Broker provides a "zero-secrets" proxy model.
Infisical's CLI is optimized for developer workflows with single-command secret injection. Conjur's ecosystem offers more architectural options (Summon, Secretless Broker) but requires learning multiple tools.
RBAC
Native role-based access control with intuitive UI. Assign roles (Developer, Admin, custom) and scope permissions by project, environment, folder, or individual secret.
Policy-as-code using YAML-based Machine Authorization Markup Language (MAML). Powerful and auditable but requires writing and maintaining policy documents. Policies define roles, permissions, and resource hierarchies declaratively.
Infisical's visual role management reduces misconfiguration risk and makes auditing accessible to non-CLI users. Conjur's policy-as-code model is well-suited for GitOps workflows and infrastructure-as-code teams, but has a steeper learning curve and no visual management layer in OSS.
Approval Workflows
Built-in approval workflows with configurable chains, native Slack/Teams notifications, and self-serve UI. No custom development required.
No native approval workflows. Secret changes take effect immediately upon policy application. Governance gates require integration with external ticketing or change management systems.
Built-in approval workflows with native Slack/Teams integration reduce setup time and ensure consistent governance without custom development or external tooling dependencies.
Access Requests
Self-serve access request portal. Developers request temporary or scoped access with built-in approval gates, auto-expiration, and full auditability.
No native access request portal. Access is granted through policy updates, which require admin intervention. JIT access patterns must be implemented through custom automation.
Self-serve access requests with built-in approval gates reduce bottlenecks on security teams while enabling least privilege by default.
Temporary Access / JIT
Native just-in-time access with configurable TTLs, approval requirements, and automatic revocation. Visual tracking of dynamic secret leases in the dashboard.
Dynamic secrets support TTL-based expiration for database credentials and cloud IAM. No unified UI for tracking active leases or configuring JIT approval gates.
Just-in-time access is a core principle of zero trust. Infisical provides JIT with visual tracking and integrated approval gates. Conjur supports ephemeral credentials through dynamic secrets but without a unified management interface.
Change Request Workflows
Git-style change request proposals for secrets. Review before changes go live with full version history.
Policy-as-code can be reviewed through external Git workflows (PR reviews on policy YAML files). No native change request UI within Conjur itself.
Infisical provides built-in change review for secrets. Conjur's policy-as-code model can leverage existing Git review processes, but this requires teams to build and maintain that workflow externally.
Access Tree Visualization
Visual, hierarchical interface to explore and audit who has access to what — across users, roles, groups, and environments. Spot misconfigurations and over-permissioning instantly.
No equivalent visualization. Auditing requires CLI queries (conjur role members, conjur resource permitted_roles) and manual policy analysis.
Visualizing access hierarchies makes it faster to answer audit questions and identify overly broad permissions across the organization.
Workflow Integrations
Native Slack and Microsoft Teams integration for real-time notifications on access requests, secret changes, and approval workflows. Configurable per project with channel selection.
No native Slack/Teams integration. Notifications and workflow integrations require custom webhook development or third-party tools.
Native integrations with collaboration tools meet teams where they already work, improving response times for approvals and alerts.
Audit Logging & SIEM
Every secret access, change, or permission grant recorded with timestamped metadata. Audit logs exportable to SIEMs or reviewed in-app for compliance.
Comprehensive audit logging with tamper-resistant audit trails. Syslog and SIEM forwarding available. Audit streaming requires Enterprise license.
Both platforms provide strong audit capabilities. Conjur's audit streaming to SIEMs is an Enterprise feature, while Infisical includes SIEM export at accessible tiers.
SPIFFE Workload Authentication
Purpose-built SPIFFE Auth method with SPIFFE-specific primitives: trust domain validation, SPIFFE ID glob patterns, and direct integration with SPIRE bundle endpoints.
No dedicated SPIFFE authenticator. SPIFFE workloads authenticate via the generic JWT Authenticator pointed at SPIRE's OIDC discovery endpoint, with SPIFFE IDs mapped through host annotations and policy files.
Both platforms support SPIFFE-identified workloads. Infisical's SPIFFE-native method reduces configuration overhead compared to adapting a generic JWT authenticator and exposes SPIFFE concepts (trust domain, SPIFFE ID patterns) directly in the UI.
Project & Environment Management
Logical separation by project and environment with independent access controls, versioning, and audit trails. Side-by-side dashboard view for comparing secrets across environments.
Hierarchical policy-based organization using namespaces and variable paths. No native project/environment abstraction or comparison UI. Environment separation achieved through policy tree structure.
Clear project and environment boundaries help prevent cross-environment credential leakage. Built-in environment comparison accelerates debugging of environment-specific issues.
Secret Versioning
Automatic versioning with timestamps, author tracking, and ability to view and restore any previous version through the dashboard.
Secrets are stored as variables with current values. No native version history — previous values are overwritten. Version tracking requires external solutions.
Automatic versioning with author attribution provides accountability and enables quick rollback when configurations change unexpectedly.
Point-in-Time Recovery
Snapshot and restore secrets to any previous state. Roll back entire folders or environments to recover from bulk misconfigurations.
Conjur retains the 20 most recent secret values, retrievable via a version parameter on the API. No dashboard UI for browsing version history or author tracking.
Environment-wide snapshots enable faster, more targeted recovery from bulk misconfigurations without requiring full database restores.
Environment Comparison
Side-by-side dashboard view comparing secrets across environments. Spot missing or mismatched values instantly.
No native comparison UI. Requires manual diffing via CLI/API or custom tooling.
Side-by-side environment comparison accelerates debugging of environment-specific issues and helps ensure configuration consistency across stages.
Secret Referencing
Reference secrets across projects, environments, and folders. Single source of truth that propagates updates everywhere automatically.
No native cross-project secret referencing. Secrets must be duplicated across policy branches or synced from CyberArk Vault.
Cross-project secret referencing establishes a single source of truth, so rotating a shared credential propagates automatically rather than requiring updates in multiple locations.
Secret Sharing
Secure, zero-knowledge sharing via expiring links with full audit trail. Safe alternative to sharing through messaging or email.
No native secret sharing mechanism. Secrets are accessed programmatically through authenticated API calls or Summon.
Secure sharing with expiration and audit trails provides a sanctioned alternative to ad-hoc sharing methods that leave credentials exposed in chat history or email.
Project Templates
Define default environments, project-level roles, and naming conventions. New projects automatically inherit organizational standards.
Policy files can be templated externally and loaded via CI/CD. No built-in project template mechanism within Conjur.
Templates enforce consistent project structure and security baselines across the organization without manual setup for each new project.
Dynamic Secrets
24+ templates: PostgreSQL, MySQL, MongoDB, Oracle, MSSQL, Cassandra, Redis, RabbitMQ, Snowflake, AWS IAM, AWS ElastiCache, Azure Entra ID, Azure SQL, GCP IAM, LDAP, Elasticsearch, Couchbase, Mongo Atlas, SAP ASE, SAP HANA, Vertica, GitHub, TOTP, K8s service accounts. Tied to JIT access workflows for least-privilege, ephemeral access.
Secrets Manager SaaS supports dynamic secrets for AWS IAM (with Azure and GCP support added more recently). Conjur Enterprise dynamic secrets rely on CyberArk's CPM component for credential generation and rotation. Database dynamic secrets coverage is narrower than dedicated secrets management platforms.
Infisical offers broader native dynamic secrets coverage across databases and cloud providers, all managed within a single platform. Conjur's dynamic secrets capabilities are more limited natively and often depend on integration with CyberArk's PAM ecosystem for full coverage.
Secret Rotation
Native secret rotation support for databases, LDAP, and cloud vendors with the ability to define custom rotation periods. Dashboard-driven configuration.
Secret rotation leverages CyberArk's Central Policy Manager (CPM), which is a separate component of the PAM platform. CPM handles automatic rotation according to password policies. Rotated secrets sync to Conjur via Vault Synchronizer. Static secrets in Conjur SaaS are not rotated automatically.
Infisical handles rotation natively within the platform. Conjur's rotation depends on CPM — a separate CyberArk PAM component — adding architectural complexity and requiring an existing CyberArk PAM deployment for full rotation capabilities.
Secret Syncs (Push)
35+ destinations: AWS Parameter Store, Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault, GCP, GitHub, Vercel, Terraform Cloud, 1Password, Heroku, Fly.io, Netlify, Railway, Render, Supabase, and more. Secret Syncs are available as part of the open source version.
No native secret sync destinations. Secrets are pulled by applications at runtime. CyberArk Secrets Hub (a separate product) syncs secrets from Conjur/Vault to AWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault, and GCP Secret Manager.
Infisical's broad push-based sync support — including serverless and PaaS coverage — is available in the open source version. Conjur follows a pull-only model; push-based syncing requires Secrets Hub, a separate product with separate licensing.
CI/CD
Native first-party integrations with GitHub Actions, GitLab CI/CD, CircleCI, Bitbucket Pipelines, Jenkins, TeamCity, Azure DevOps.
Jenkins plugin, Ansible collection/lookup plugin, Terraform provider, Puppet module. GitHub Actions and GitLab CI support through Summon or CLI-based workflows rather than first-party plugins.
Infisical offers more turnkey, first-party CI/CD integrations. Conjur's CI/CD coverage focuses on traditional tools (Jenkins, Ansible, Puppet) with newer platforms supported through generic CLI/Summon patterns.
Framework & IaC
Framework hooks for Remix, SvelteKit, Vite, Vue, Spring Boot/Maven, Gradle. First-class Ansible modules, Terraform provider, Backstage plugin.
Terraform provider, Ansible collection, Puppet module. No framework-specific hooks or Backstage integration. Summon utility provides a generic injection mechanism for any process.
Turnkey framework hooks and IaC integrations eliminate glue code. Conjur's Summon utility is flexible but generic — it doesn't provide framework-specific optimizations.
Agent
Lightweight agent for VMs and non-Kubernetes workloads. Fetches and injects secrets, handles token refresh, and renders secrets to files or environment variables.
Conjur Followers can be deployed on-prem or in private clouds to cache and serve secrets locally. Secretless Broker acts as a proxy that handles credentials transparently. No lightweight standalone agent equivalent.
Infisical Agent is a lightweight sidecar for secret injection on VMs. Conjur's Follower model is heavier (full Conjur node) but provides local caching. Secretless Broker offers a unique zero-secrets proxy approach but requires more architectural planning.
Kubernetes
Operator syncs to K8s Secrets via CRDs (InfisicalSecret, InfisicalPushSecret) with auto-reload for Deployments, DaemonSets, and StatefulSets. ConfigMap support. Agent Injector (mutating webhook sidecar). CSI Provider.
Kubernetes Authenticator Client (sidecar or init container) for certificate-based or JWT-based authentication. Secrets Provider for K8s populates native Kubernetes Secrets or pushes secrets to file volumes. ESO provider also available. No first-party CRD-based Operator with auto-reload. Supports OpenShift, GKE, EKS, AKS, Rancher.
Infisical's CRD-based Operator provides declarative, GitOps-friendly secret sync with native auto-reload. Conjur's Secrets Provider populates K8s Secrets but requires per-pod manifest changes rather than declarative CRDs, and does not support automatic workload reloading on secret change.
Internal CA
Create and manage private CA hierarchies with root and intermediate CAs. Visual certificate management dashboard. Certificate Templates and Profiles for policy-driven issuance.
No native internal CA. Certificate issuance in Conjur SaaS is handled through integration with CyberArk Certificate Manager, which connects to external CAs (DigiCert, GlobalSign, Zero Touch PKI, Microsoft ADCS). Conjur does not issue certificates independently.
Infisical provides a self-contained internal PKI. Conjur's certificate capabilities require CyberArk Certificate Manager — a separate product — and depend on external CA integrations rather than providing an independent CA.
External CA Integration
Integrate with Let's Encrypt, DigiCert, Microsoft AD CS, Google Trust Services, SSL.com, any ACME-compatible CA.
Integration through CyberArk Certificate Manager with DigiCert, GlobalSign, Zero Touch PKI, Microsoft ADCS. Requires separate CyberArk Certificate Manager product.
Infisical integrates directly with external CAs from the core platform. Conjur's external CA integration requires an additional CyberArk product.
Enrollment Methods
API, ACME (automated certificate management), EST (Enrollment over Secure Transport) for device and workload enrollment.
API-based certificate requests (issue and sign). No ACME server or EST support.
ACME and EST support enable automated certificate management for a wider range of devices and workloads, including those that cannot use proprietary APIs.
Certificate Syncs
Push certificates to AWS Certificate Manager, AWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault, and more.
No native certificate sync destinations. Certificates are stored within the CyberArk platform.
Certificate sync automates distribution to cloud services, reducing manual steps in certificate deployment workflows.
Certificate Discovery
Automatically scan network infrastructure — IP ranges, CIDR blocks, and domains — across TLS ports to discover deployed certificates. Schedule recurring scans. Supports scanning through Gateway for private networks.
No native certificate discovery. Conjur only tracks certificates issued through its own platform or CyberArk Certificate Manager.
Most organizations don't know where all their certificates are deployed. Discovery eliminates blind spots and prevents surprise expirations from untracked certificates.
Certificate Alerts
Configurable expiration alerts and webhook notifications for certificate lifecycle events.
No native certificate alerting within Conjur. Alerting depends on CyberArk Certificate Manager or external monitoring.
Expiration alerts help prevent outages caused by overlooked certificate renewals.
PAM Capabilities
Built-in PAM with session recording for database queries, SSH, RDP, and K8s access. Credential rotation. Full audit trails. SSH certificate-based authentication included as a native access method. Available in both cloud and self-hosted deployments.
Conjur itself does not provide PAM capabilities. CyberArk's PAM platform (Privilege Cloud or PAM Self-Hosted) is a separate product suite that provides privileged session management, credential vaulting, and session recording. Conjur integrates with PAM to extend secrets to DevOps workflows.
Infisical includes PAM as part of the core platform. CyberArk separates PAM and secrets management into distinct products, requiring separate licensing, deployment, and management for each capability.
Session Recording
All session activity recorded automatically when users connect through Infisical Gateway. Recordings stored centrally with searchable playback across database queries, SSH, RDP, and K8s sessions.
Session recording is a CyberArk PAM capability, not a Conjur capability. CyberArk Privileged Session Manager (PSM) provides session recording for SSH, RDP, and database sessions as part of the broader PAM platform.
Centralized, searchable session recording within the secrets management platform reduces operational overhead for compliance and forensics.
Gateway
Lightweight, single binary deployed with a single CLI command (infisical gateway). Outbound-only SSH reverse tunnels — no inbound firewall rules required. Works for all platform features: dynamic secrets, rotation, LDAP, PKI, and PAM.
Conjur Followers can be deployed in private networks to serve secrets locally. SaaS deployments use Secrets Manager Edge for local secret caching and offline access. Both require running containerized Conjur components in the private network.
Infisical's Gateway is a single binary serving all platform features with zero inbound firewall changes. Conjur's Follower/Edge model provides local secret caching but requires deploying and managing full Conjur containers in the private network.
Secret Scanning
Built-in scanning for 140+ secret types across Git repos and infrastructure. Fast remediation and reduced blast radius of leaks.
No native secret scanning. CyberArk does not offer a built-in tool for detecting exposed secrets in code repositories or infrastructure.
Secret scanning proactively identifies exposed credentials before they can be exploited, reducing the window of exposure and complementing secrets management with prevention.
Encryption
AES-256-GCM encryption at rest. FIPS 140-3 compliant. Full data sovereignty through self-hosting.
Industry-standard cryptography via Slosilo library (professionally audited). Encryption using a master data key (CONJUR_DATA_KEY) that must be securely managed. FIPS available.
Both use strong encryption and support FIPS 140-3 out of the box. Both support external key management
KMS / BYOK
Bring Your Own Key (BYOK) with AWS KMS, Azure Key Vault, GCP Cloud KMS, or custom HSMs. You retain full visibility and revocation capabilities. Infisical never stores or sees your root keys.
Master data key managed by the customer. No native integration with cloud KMS providers for root key management. HSM integration available through CyberArk's Enterprise Vault.
Infisical provides straightforward BYOK with major cloud KMS providers. Conjur's key management model relies on a static master data key rather than integrating with cloud-native KMS services.
KMIP
Acts as KMIP server for integration with legacy HSMs, databases, and enterprise tools.
No native KMIP support within Conjur. KMIP capabilities are part of CyberArk's broader PAM/Vault platform.
KMIP server support enables integration with enterprise tools and legacy infrastructure that rely on the standard key management protocol.
Compliance
SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, GDPR, FIPS 140-3.
CyberArk platform holds SOC 2, ISO 27001, and other enterprise certifications. Conjur-specific compliance certifications are not separately detailed in public documentation.
Both platforms support enterprise compliance requirements. CyberArk's certifications apply at the platform level across the broader Identity Security suite.
AI Agent Security
Agentic Sentinel: MCP (Model Context Protocol) permission management for users and AI agents. Control what tools and resources AI agents can access with policy-based governance. SPIFFE/SPIRE integration for workload identity.
No native AI agent governance. CyberArk's broader platform is developing identity security for AI agents, but Conjur does not currently provide dedicated AI agent access controls.
As AI agents proliferate in enterprise environments, controlling their access to secrets and resources becomes critical. Dedicated governance tooling for AI agents reduces the risk of unauthorized access through automated systems.
Storage Backend
PostgreSQL — battle-tested, horizontally scalable, and already familiar to most ops teams. Works with RDS, Cloud SQL.
PostgreSQL — Conjur also uses PostgreSQL as its backing data store. Compatible with managed databases like AWS RDS.
High Availability
Multiple stateless instances behind load balancer with shared PostgreSQL. Standard, well-understood patterns.
Leader/Standby/Follower topology with auto-failover. Requires managing replication, quorum, and master data key distribution. HA configurations add 30–50% to deployment complexity and licensing costs.
Operational Model
Stateless application servers with Postgres persistence. Configure via environment variables, Helm charts, or Terraform. Rolling deployments with automatic database migrations.
Appliance-based containers requiring master data key management, authenticator allowlisting per node, certificate rotation across Leader/Standby/Follower nodes. Professional services often recommended for initial setup and major upgrades.
Upgrades
Rolling deployment of stateless instances. Database migrations handled automatically.
Careful version upgrade procedures with master data key considerations, cluster coordination, and Follower re-seeding.
Air-Gapped
Full support with Gateway for connecting to isolated resources. Offline packages available.
Conjur Enterprise supports air-gapped deployment. Conjur SaaS requires connectivity to CyberArk's cloud. Follower nodes can provide local secret access in partially-connected environments.
Looking to improve your secret management processes?Talk to an expert
Why Infisical?
Full transparency and control. Open-source codebase your security team can audit, with self-hosting on any infrastructure. No dependency on a closed-source, SaaS-only vendor.
Developer experience that drives adoption. An intuitive dashboard, first-party SDKs, 35+ secret syncs, and single-command CLI injection make it easy for teams to do the right thing — reducing secrets sprawl across the organization.
Built-in governance, no assembly required. Approval workflows, change request reviews, access requests with auto-expiration, and native Slack/Teams integration — all out of the box without ServiceNow or custom engineering.
Enterprise-proven with full deployment flexibility. Trusted by Fortune 500 organizations across finance, healthcare, aerospace, and technology — deployed in cloud, on-prem, and air-gapped environments.
Ready to Get Started?
- Start Free — Full-featured free tier. No credit card required.
- Book a Demo — See Infisical in action with your use cases.
- Read the Docs — Dive into technical documentation.
Starting with Infisical is simple, fast, and free.
PRODUCT
CONTACT